Wrong Vs. Badly. by Dean Gotcher

Wrong vs. Badly.
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

"When a man has finally reached the point where he does not think he knows it better than others, that is when he has become indifferent to what they have done badly and he is interested only in what they have done right, then peace and affirmation have come to him." (G. F. W. Hegel, in one of the casual notes preserved at Widener)

"There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 16:25

The difference between "right and wrong" and "right and badly" is that in the first you will be punished for being or doing wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth—which is objective—in the second you will only be remediated (at the most) for "hurting" the other persons "feelings"—which is subjective. Liberals (socialists), believing in "right and badly," in their mind should never be punished when they are wrong, only needing to do things "better" the next time, punishing conservatives who believe in "right and wrong"—their way of thinking being wrong. This is why 'liberals' and socialist never go to jail (are punished) for doing wrong. Conservatives, on the other hand, go to jail (are punished) when they are wrong—under socialist control going to jail simply because they believe in "right and wrong." In this way the criminal is never wrong, only behaving "badly," needing to be remediate, while the victim is wrong for accusing the perpetrator as being wrong, needing to be punished. The victim therefore needs to be remediated (build relationship) with the perpetrator if they (both the victim and the perpetrator) are to become "better," i.e., are no longer to behave "badly"—thinking "right and wrong."

When you replace wrong with "badly," wrong is negated so man can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, with impunity, i.e., everyone approval, i.e., affirmation.

On a side note: It used to be parents trained their children up to "do right and not wrong" according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., according to their standards but over the years (after the depression of the 30's) the emphasis came to be, for their children to have a "better" life. While there is nothing wrong with having a "better" life, without learning to do right and not wrong while working toward it, all you will end up with are the lazy, the incompetent, and the vicious ruling the home and the world. Add "till something 'better' comes along" to the marriage vow "for better or for worse," for example and 'change' will be guaranteed from the get-go, allowing the perpetrator (at the most behaving "badly" in his or her mind) to do wrong without having a guilty conscience, with the victim, having a wrong understanding of marriage (a "right-wrong" way of thinking) just needing to "get over it," i.e., just needing to learn to "get along," learning to think "right-badly" (where there is no judgment and/or condemnation) instead of "right-wrong" (where there is).

"Jurisprudence of terror takes two forms; loosely defined rules which produces unpredictable law, and spontaneous changes in rules to best suit the state." (R. W. Makepeace and Croom Helm, Marxist Ideology and Soviet Criminal Law)

This is how 'liberal' (socialist) judges think and act, making decisions on the persons social worth, i.e., "right-badly," not on "rule of law," i.e., "right and wrong." If the court decides on social worth, i.e., on "right-badly" then there can be no justice for the individual (unless he or she is a socialist or serves a socialists purpose). What the Magna Carta and the American Revolution had in common was the removal of social worth, i.e., "wrong-badly" from the court, judging everyone (rich and poor, the king and "the people") from the same law, i.e., "rule of law," i.e., "right and wrong" according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, not opinions ("feelings," i.e., "self interest"). The greatest barrier to a 'liberal,' i.e., to a socialist coming to know the truth is their refusal to admit that they are wrong (when they are wrong), refusing to accept accountability for their thoughts and actions, always blaming someone else or the situation for their "bad" behavior, so they can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" (have peace with their "self") without having a guilty conscience, i.e., so they can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity (with affirmation from others).

"When a man has finally reached the point where he does not think he knows it better than others, that is when he has become indifferent to what they have done badly and he is interested only in what they have done right, then peace ["lust," i.e., enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating] and affirmation ['justification' of "self," i.e., of "lust" before others of common "lust(s)"] have come to him." (G. F. W. Hegel, in one of the casual notes preserved at Widener) Emphasis added. Since Hegel did not use the word "wrong," which is the right word to use in contrast to "right," using the word "badly" instead, he guaranteed the outcome to be based upon "esteeming" "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., "human nature," i.e., the child's desire for ("lusting" after) the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating instead of upon the child learning to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, recognizing the father's/Father's authority, doing the father's/Father's will.

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), of (and now for) "self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

"Laws must not fetter human life; but yield to it; they must change as the needs and capacities of the people change [making law subjective, i.e., subject to the "felt needs" and perception of those in power, i.e., "If I feel this way, i.e., loving pleasure and hating restraint, everyone one else should feel this way as well"]." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right') During the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process the participants take on the living personification of "the people," with their "feelings" (in common with everyone else in the room who are participating) becoming "the peoples feelings," making any who resist them, i.e., resist their will, resisters of "the people," i.e., resisters of "the peoples" will. As participants "self interests" change in the consensus meetings the laws they make 'change' in accordance to their "felt needs," i.e., the needs of "the people" in their mind. Contracts are therefore always readily adaptable to 'change' based upon the "feelings" of those establishing policy for "the people," with the pleasure of "the people," i.e., of those being in power becoming the main objective in mind.

"Self-perfection of the human individual is fulfilled in union with the world in pleasure." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth], and desperately wicked [hating the father's/Father's authority that "gets in the way," i.e. that prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates]: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9 You can not see your "self interest," which includes your hate of restraint, as being evil, i.e., "wicked" ("desperately wicked") because your love of pleasure ("self interest"), getting in the way, blinds you to it. Like a drug, pleasure (dopamine emancipation), i.e., "self interest" which the world stimulates blinds you to your hatred toward restraint, i.e., blinds you to your "wickedness" which is being expressed toward those who are preventing (or trying to prevent) you from having access to the drug, i.e., to pleasure (dopamine emancipation) when you are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning—making you not just wicked but "desperately wicked" in your effort to attain it, keep it, or get it back

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12